CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF MODERN FIXED PROSTHETIC RESTORATIONS IN PARTIAL EDENTULISM
Vol. 2 No. 02 (2026), Articles
Vol. 2 No. 02 (2026)

CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF MODERN FIXED PROSTHETIC RESTORATIONS IN PARTIAL EDENTULISM

Articles
Published 2026-02-04
Nilufar Islamova Bustanovna
Associate Professor of Orthopedic Dentistry Department of Samarkand State Medical University
Luqmon Bekmurodov Rustamovich
Assistant of the Department of Oral Surgery and Dental Implantology of Samarkand State Medical University
Jaloliddin Asatboyev Asliddin ugli
Samarkand State Medical University, Department of Oral Surgery and Dentistry, 2nd year master
PDF

Keywords

Partial edentulism, fixed prosthetic restorations, dental crowns, bridges, implant-supported prostheses, oral rehabilitation, patient satisfaction.

How to Cite

Islamova Bustanovna, N., Bekmurodov Rustamovich, L., & Asatboyev Asliddin ugli, J. (2026). CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF MODERN FIXED PROSTHETIC RESTORATIONS IN PARTIAL EDENTULISM. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND INNOVATIVE RESEARCH, 2(02), 7–9. Retrieved from https://scienceinno.org/index.php/iccir/article/view/90
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

Partial edentulism remains a common clinical condition that negatively affects mastication, speech, occlusal stability, and facial aesthetics. Modern fixed prosthetic restorations, including metal-ceramic, all-ceramic, and implant-supported fixed prostheses, have significantly advanced in terms of biomechanical properties, aesthetics, and long-term clinical performance. This thesis evaluates the clinical effectiveness of contemporary fixed prosthetic solutions in patients with partial tooth loss, focusing on functional rehabilitation, aesthetic outcomes, durability, and patient satisfaction. The findings demonstrate that modern fixed restorations provide predictable and stable results when supported by accurate diagnosis, proper case selection, and adherence to prosthodontic principles, thereby improving oral function and quality of life.

PDF

References

1. Rosenstiel, S. F., Land, M. F., & Fujimoto, J. (2016). Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. Elsevier.

2. Shillingburg, H. T., Hobo, S., Whitsett, L. D., Jacobi, R., & Brackett, S. E. (2017). Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. Quintessence Publishing.

3. Goodacre, C. J., Bernal, G., Rungcharassaeng, K., & Kan, J. Y. K. (2018). Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 120(1), 14–25.

4. Pjetursson, B. E., & Lang, N. P. (2014). Prosthetic treatment outcomes in partially edentulous patients. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 25(Suppl. 4), 123–135.

5. Sailer, I., Makarov, N. A., Thoma, D. S., Zwahlen, M., & Pjetursson, B. E. (2015). All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses. Dental Materials, 31(6), 603–623.

6. Zarone, F., Di Mauro, M. I., Ausiello, P., & Sorrentino, R. (2019). Current status of CAD/CAM technologies in fixed prosthodontics. Journal of Dentistry, 80, 1–10.

7. Tan, K., Pjetursson, B. E., Lang, N. P., & Chan, E. S. (2017). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(6), 787–798.

8. Klineberg, I., & Eckert, S. (2019). Occlusion and functional considerations in fixed prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 121(4), 566–574.

9. American College of Prosthodontists. (2021). Clinical Practice Guidelines for Fixed Prosthetic Restorations. ACP Publications.

10. Albrektsson, T., & Zarb, G. A. (2018). Osseointegration and long-term success of implant-supported fixed prostheses. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 33(1), 3–14.