PREDICTION OF COMPLICATIONS AND MODERN METHODS OF PREVENTION OF POSTHYSTERECTOMY SYNDROME IN WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE
PDF

Keywords

Posthysterectomy syndrome; hysterectomy; reproductive age; complication prediction; prevention strategies; ovarian function; hormone replacement therapy; quality of life.

How to Cite

Kamarova Nuriddinovna, I., & Shavazi Nuralievna, N. (2026). PREDICTION OF COMPLICATIONS AND MODERN METHODS OF PREVENTION OF POSTHYSTERECTOMY SYNDROME IN WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND INNOVATIVE RESEARCH, 2(1), 33–35. Retrieved from https://scienceinno.org/index.php/iccir/article/view/65

Abstract

Posthysterectomy syndrome (PHS) represents a complex of neuroendocrine, metabolic, psychoemotional, and somatic disorders that may develop after hysterectomy, particularly in women of reproductive age. Despite the organ-preserving trends in modern gynecology, hysterectomy remains a frequently performed surgical procedure, often leading to long-term complications that significantly impair quality of life. Early prediction of posthysterectomy complications is essential for developing individualized preventive strategies. This article focuses on the identification of key risk factors associated with the development of posthysterectomy syndrome, including patient age, ovarian preservation status, hormonal imbalance, pre-existing comorbidities, and surgical technique. Modern preventive approaches are analyzed, encompassing preoperative risk stratification, minimally invasive surgical methods, ovarian function preservation, hormone replacement therapy, and comprehensive postoperative rehabilitation programs. The integration of predictive models and personalized preventive measures may significantly reduce the incidence and severity of posthysterectomy syndrome, improve functional outcomes, and enhance the overall well-being of women of reproductive age.

PDF

References

1. Farquhar CM, Steiner CA. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2002;99(2):229–234.

2. Moorman PG, Schildkraut JM, Myers ER, Wang F. Effect of hysterectomy with ovarian preservation on ovarian function. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2011;118(6):1271–1279.

3. Shuster LT, Gostout BS, Grossardt BR, Rocca WA. Prophylactic oophorectomy in premenopausal women and long-term health risks. Menopause International. 2008;14(3):111–116.

4. Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Khan Z, Weaver AL, Smith CY, Rocca WA. Cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity after hysterectomy. Menopause. 2018;25(5):483–492.

5. Harmanli O, Jones KA, Harmanli A. Post-hysterectomy complications and quality of life outcomes. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2014;21(3):421–428.

6. Parker WH. Bilateral oophorectomy versus ovarian conservation. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010;116(5):1023–1033.

7. Rocca WA, Grossardt BR, Shuster LT. Long-term effects of hysterectomy on endocrine function. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2014;2(9):681–690.

8. Tulandi T, Al-Sannan B. Surgical techniques and postoperative outcomes in hysterectomy. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2019;59:59–68.

9. Lykke R, Blaakær J, Ottesen B, Gimbel H. Hysterectomy techniques and postoperative complications. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2013;92(8):908–915.

10. Siddle N, Sarrel P, Whitehead M. The effect of hysterectomy on ovarian function. Climacteric. 2012;15(2):123–129.