ASSESSMENT OF MASTICATORY EFFICIENCY IN PATIENTS USING IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES
PDF

Keywords

implant-supported prostheses, masticatory efficiency, dental implants, oral function, patient satisfaction

How to Cite

Niyozov Rabbimkulovich, O., & Islamova Bustanovna, N. (2026). ASSESSMENT OF MASTICATORY EFFICIENCY IN PATIENTS USING IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND INNOVATIVE RESEARCH, 2(02), 15–18. Retrieved from https://scienceinno.org/index.php/iccir/article/view/103

Abstract

Implant-supported prostheses have become a standard solution for restoring masticatory function in partially or completely edentulous patients. Masticatory efficiency, defined as the ability to chew and process food effectively, is a critical outcome measure reflecting functional success of implant therapy. This study aimed to assess masticatory efficiency in patients using implant-supported prostheses and compare it with conventional removable dentures. A cross-sectional study of 80 patients was conducted using objective masticatory tests and patient-reported outcomes. Results demonstrated that implant-supported prostheses significantly improved chewing performance, bite force, and patient satisfaction compared to conventional dentures. These findings highlight the functional advantages of implant-supported rehabilitation and its positive impact on oral health-related quality of life.

PDF

References

1. Van der Bilt A. Assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: a review. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(10):754–780.

2. Carlsson G.E., et al. Masticatory efficiency in patients with implant-supported overdentures. J Dent Res. 2003;82(5):360–364.

3. Fontijn-Tekamp F.A., et al. Biting and chewing efficiency of patients with implant-supported prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(3):223–228.

4. Kato Y., et al. Bite force and chewing performance in elderly patients with dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(6):709–714.

5. Awad M.A., et al. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained dentures: functional and psychosocial aspects. J Dent Res. 2003;82(12):1024–1028.

6. Gerritsen A.E., et al. Functional outcomes of implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(2):181–196.

7. Sato Y., et al. Effects of implant-supported prostheses on masticatory function and quality of life. J Prosthodont Res. 2012;56(4):283–288.

8. Koshino H., et al. The influence of implant number and location on chewing efficiency. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(5):779–784.

9. Peyron M.A., et al. Oral function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported prostheses. Clin Oral Investig. 2000;4(3):172–177.

10. Morais J.B., et al. Objective assessment of masticatory performance in patients with dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(2):193–199.